5.1. General direction of methodology
McNarama, 2000; Davies, 1989). Therefore,
the results of the study can be hoped to
The research question is checking the
contribute the following:
face validity of the IET through the students’
• This study is one of the few, which
and English lecturers’ perceptions. This stage
will shed light on the review of literature
needs to take place after the students have just
on language testing practices and provide
completed their IET and the lecturers have just
educators with more information related to
finished teaching their third -semester English
test validation.
course. During the first stage, both students
and English lecturers would be required
• This present study may be valuable for
to assess the IET components: Listening,
other institutions in their endeavor to validate
Reading, Writing, and Speaking, assess IET
in-house tests, to justify the correctness of
format and weighting and then respond to the
their interpretations. They may take this study
data collection instruments.
as a guideline to examine the quality of their
locally-designed assessment tools. Most
In fulfilling the requirements for carrying
out this study, the research figured out the
study would undertake in Figure 1 below:
general direction of Methodology that the
FACE VALIDITY
Face validity questionnaire for lecturers
Face validity questionnaire for students
Step 1 Assess IET components (L,R,W,S)
Step 1 Assess IET components (L,R,W,S)
Step 2 Assess IET format and weighting
Step 2 Assess IET format and weighting
Respond to data collection instruments
Figure 1. General direction of methodology
collected. The focus on test weightage, time
Bạn đang xem 5. - FACE VALIDITY OF THE INSTITUTIONAL ENGLISH BASED ON THE COMMON EUROPEAN FRAMEWORK OF REFERENCE AT A PUBLIC UNIVERSITY IN VIETNAM
