2 THE ‘TRADITIONAL’ APPROACH TO RISK PROBABLY THE MOST TRADITIONAL O...
Probably the most traditional or conventional project structure involves an
employer who instructs a consultant to design certain work and to administer
the contract. The contractor tenders against the designs and specifications
prepared by the employer ’ s consultant. If his tender is successful, he enters
into a contract by which he undertakes to carry out the works in accordance
with those designs and specifications. The engineer or architect acts as the
employer ’ s agent and certifies milestone stages and payments in accordance
with the terms of the contract, as well as deciding such matters as the contrac-
tor ’ s entitlement to extensions of time or additional payment should there be
variations, delays or disruption to the work. The contract price will typically
be on a firm basis, normally a lump sum, or on the basis of unit prices with
provision for re-measurement; provisional sums for items of work which can-
not be fixed or defined at the outset might also be included. There will be
provision also for assessing the value of any variations duly instructed in
accordance with the contract.
The FIDIC Red Book has closely matched this traditional form of project.
The Red Book is recommended for building or engineering works designed
by the employer or by his representative, the engineer. The contractor is to
construct the works in accordance with a design provided by the employer,
although the works could include some elements of contractor-design. The
engineer is appointed to carry out traditional roles of administration and cer-
tification of the contract, acting as the employer ’ s agent.
The Yellow Book differs from the Red primarily in that the Yellow Book is
intended for use where the contractor is responsible for the design of the
work. Reviewing earlier editions of the two Books, FIDIC took the view that
the decision whether to use the Red or Yellow Book should rest upon which of
the parties was mainly responsible for design, rather than the type of work to
be carried out. The Red Book, published in its present form in 1999, was
developed to be suitable for building and civil and other engineering works
designed by the employer or the engineer, and the Yellow Book was to be suit-
able for plant and for building and engineering work designed by or on behalf
of the contractor. In both cases, the engineer was to perform traditional
administration and certifying roles.
In the Red and Yellow Books, the contractor usually bears the risk of delay
and additional cost, if he is able to control the relevant events. For example,
where physical conditions cause delay or additional cost, the contractor will
bear the risk of both if the conditions were reasonably foreseeable; however, if
the physical conditions (including ground conditions) were not reasonably
foreseeable then the contractor will be entitled (subject to complying with the
requirements for making a contractor ’ s claim under clause 20.1) to additional
time and cost resulting from the unforeseeable conditions (clause 4.12).
Where damage or delay to the works results from war or civil commotion,
on the other hand, under the Red and Yellow Books the employer bears the
risk of delay to the contract and additional costs to the contractor, by clause