1. WHY MDCT IN THIS STUDY

3.1. Why MDCT in this study?

Figure 1. Components of language competence [13: 87].

Socio-linguistic competence is “the

[13: 97] framework, refers to the ability of a

sensitivity to, or control of the conventions of

language user to “either formulate or interpret

an utterance which in not only linguistically

language use that are determined by the features

correct, but which is also phrased…in a

of the specific language use context; it enables

nativelike way”. Alternatively, it is the

us to perform language function in ways that

are appropriate to that context” [13: 94]. Four

sensitivity to sentences which would be said or

abilities under socio-linguistic competence are

written by speakers of a language who are

native to the culture of that language.

sensitivity to differences in dialect or variety, to

differences in register, to naturalness; and the

In short, DCT is a tool to assess pragmatic

ability to interpret cultural references and

knowledge or competence, more specifically, to

figures of speech. Naturalness, or in other

evaluate sensitivity to naturalness of not only

words, sensitivity to naturalness, in Bachman”s

L2 and FL, but also L1.

Among the six types of DCTs, the present

MDCTs seemed to outweigh its disadvantages.

Therefore, MDCTs were chosen as the means to

study employed only one type, MDCT, to

collect data to measure the receptor”s responses

measure receptors” responses to the naturalness

of 35 sentences in the Vietnamese translations

to the naturalness of a number of sentences in

of five Australian short stories. In this study,

the TTs.

informants were not required to read a written