4 CHAPTER CONCLUSION IN THE ABOVE CHAPTER, THE MAIN COMPONENTS OF...

2.4  Chapter  Conclusion  

In the above chapter, the main components of national flood compensation systems have been identified

based on an original categorisation by Paudel (2012). The components and their attributes have been

described in a way which can be used as a basic analytical framework in the next chapter to attempt to

make meaningful comparisons between the country case studies and understand the relative strengths

and weaknesses of each system..

The chapter has highlighted the fact that the components and attributes of flood compensation systems

identified operate together and not in isolation. For example, the high correlation between the

voluntary/mandatory status and flood insurance penetration is captured in categorisations by Swiss Re

(2012) and also by Jongejan and Barrieu (2008). The social welfare aspect of flood insurance is also

reflected in a categorisation by O’Neill & O’Neill (2012). This incorporates the choices policy makers face

when designing flood insurance systems to include, or not, principles of social justice. This is important

to understand the social advantages or disadvantages that private flood insurance might bring to the

Netherlands.

The concept of what it means for a flood insurance system to be effective has been set out . First ,five

general principles of insurance were described as the basis for financially viable and economically

efficient insurance systems in general. Second, the need to overcome the four key challenges of

providing flood insurance was also indicated as a prerequisite to theoretical effectiveness.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

accusations of political expediency leading to waste and inefficiency compared to private insurance arrangements that might

slow down the recovery period and therefore lead to an increase overall losses (Botzen & Van Den Bergh (2008).

10

28  

The output of this chapter is a comprehensive analysis of what effectiveness entails in relation to the

components and attributes of different flood insurance systems. Below is a table that sets out an

analytical framework for use in subsequent research steps. It consists of the following elements - see

next page:

 

29  

Flood Insurance System Component Attribute(s)

Historical Context Brief description of how the system developed

Insurance System Type Private; Public; Public-Private

Financial Attributes Hazards covered (Fresh water; storm surge; other

natural disasters); source of finance (General

taxation; premiums; reserve equalisation subsidy;

sovereign guarantee; reinsurers)

Public/Private Sector Responsibilities The public/private mix. Who is responsible for:

Insurance policy sale and administration; liability

for financial risk; flood protection and mitigation;

who pays financial compensation: private or

public

Mandatory/Voluntary Status Free market voluntary; compulsory flood cover;

quasi-mandatory flood cover when bundled with

other property insurances.

Market Penetration % uptake of flood insurance and which property

types and communities covered.

Risk Transference Mechanisms Up-stream: reinsurance, CAT bonds, hedging and

other financial instruments.

Downstream: deductibles, risk based premiums,

other new underwriting tools

Mitigation Incentives Effectiveness of insurance risk transference

mechanisms to motivate policyholders or

governments to invest in flood loss protection and

mitigation and measures

Underwriting and Assessment Tools Flood data, flood models and assessment tools

such as remote sensing

Principles of Social Justice Individual, risk sensitive or solidaristic risk

insensitive insurance

Normative Perceptions How the national flood insurance system is

viewed by society in terms of its overall

effectiveness

Future Direction Description of likely future direction of the national

flood compensation system and relevant changes

Table 2: Analytical Framework of Flood Insurance Systems

30  

3  UK  Flood  Insurance