2.4 Chapter Conclusion
In the above chapter, the main components of national flood compensation systems have been identified
based on an original categorisation by Paudel (2012). The components and their attributes have been
described in a way which can be used as a basic analytical framework in the next chapter to attempt to
make meaningful comparisons between the country case studies and understand the relative strengths
and weaknesses of each system..
The chapter has highlighted the fact that the components and attributes of flood compensation systems
identified operate together and not in isolation. For example, the high correlation between the
voluntary/mandatory status and flood insurance penetration is captured in categorisations by Swiss Re
(2012) and also by Jongejan and Barrieu (2008). The social welfare aspect of flood insurance is also
reflected in a categorisation by O’Neill & O’Neill (2012). This incorporates the choices policy makers face
when designing flood insurance systems to include, or not, principles of social justice. This is important
to understand the social advantages or disadvantages that private flood insurance might bring to the
Netherlands.
The concept of what it means for a flood insurance system to be effective has been set out . First ,five
general principles of insurance were described as the basis for financially viable and economically
efficient insurance systems in general. Second, the need to overcome the four key challenges of
providing flood insurance was also indicated as a prerequisite to theoretical effectiveness.
accusations of political expediency leading to waste and inefficiency compared to private insurance arrangements that might
slow down the recovery period and therefore lead to an increase overall losses (Botzen & Van Den Bergh (2008).
10
28
The output of this chapter is a comprehensive analysis of what effectiveness entails in relation to the
components and attributes of different flood insurance systems. Below is a table that sets out an
analytical framework for use in subsequent research steps. It consists of the following elements - see
next page:
29
Flood Insurance System Component Attribute(s)
Historical Context Brief description of how the system developed
Insurance System Type Private; Public; Public-Private
Financial Attributes Hazards covered (Fresh water; storm surge; other
natural disasters); source of finance (General
taxation; premiums; reserve equalisation subsidy;
sovereign guarantee; reinsurers)
Public/Private Sector Responsibilities The public/private mix. Who is responsible for:
Insurance policy sale and administration; liability
for financial risk; flood protection and mitigation;
who pays financial compensation: private or
public
Mandatory/Voluntary Status Free market voluntary; compulsory flood cover;
quasi-mandatory flood cover when bundled with
other property insurances.
Market Penetration % uptake of flood insurance and which property
types and communities covered.
Risk Transference Mechanisms Up-stream: reinsurance, CAT bonds, hedging and
other financial instruments.
Downstream: deductibles, risk based premiums,
other new underwriting tools
Mitigation Incentives Effectiveness of insurance risk transference
mechanisms to motivate policyholders or
governments to invest in flood loss protection and
mitigation and measures
Underwriting and Assessment Tools Flood data, flood models and assessment tools
such as remote sensing
Principles of Social Justice Individual, risk sensitive or solidaristic risk
insensitive insurance
Normative Perceptions How the national flood insurance system is
viewed by society in terms of its overall
effectiveness
Future Direction Description of likely future direction of the national
flood compensation system and relevant changes
Table 2: Analytical Framework of Flood Insurance Systems
30
3 UK Flood Insurance