COMPUTING WORD-PAIR ANTONYMY. INPROCEED-LANGUAGE RESOURCES AND E...

2008. Computing word-pair antonymy. InProceed-Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2006).ings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Nat-ural Language Processing and Computational Nat-Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Scott Grimm, andural Language Learning (EMNLP-2008).Christopher Potts. 2009. Not a simple ‘yes’ orRobert Munro, Steven Bethard, Victor Kuperman,‘no’: Uncertainty in indirect answers. InProceed-ings of the 10th Annual SIGDIAL Meeting on Dis-Vicky Tzuyin Lai, Robin Melnick, Christophercourse and Dialogue.Potts, Tyler Schnoebelen, and Harry Tily. 2010.Crowdsourcing and language studies: The new gen-Gilles Fauconnier. 1975. Pragmatic scales and logicaleration of linguistic data. InNAACL 2010 Workshopstructure. Linguistic Inquiry, 6(3):353–375.on Creating Speech and Language Data With Ama-zon’s Mechanical Turk.Nancy Green and Sandra Carberry. 1994. A hybridreasoning model for indirect answers. InProceed-Bo Pang and Lillian Lee. 2008. Opinion mining andings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Associationsentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in In-for Computational Linguistics, pages 58–65.formation Retrieval, 2(1):1–135.Nancy Green and Sandra Carberry. 1999. Interpret-C. Raymond Perrault and James F. Allen. 1980. Aing and generating indirect answers. Computationalplan-based analysis of indirect speech acts. Amer-Linguistics, 25(3):389–435.ican Journal of Computational Linguistics, 6(3-