20.3.3 Complexity and stability in model communities:
local and global
local stability and global stability. Local
populations
stability
stability describes the tendency of a
community to return to its original state
(or something close to it) when subjected to a small perturbation.
The conventional wisdom, however, has by no means always
received support, and has been undermined in particular by the
Global stability describes this tendency when the community is
subjected to a large perturbation.
analysis of mathematical models. A watershed study was that by
May (1972). He constructed model food webs comprising a num-
A third aspect is related to the
ber of species, and examined the way in which the population
local/global distinction but concen-
dynamic fragility and
size of each species changed in the neighborhood of its equilib-
trates more on the environment of the
robustness
rium abundance (i.e. the local stability of individual populations).
community. The stability of any com-
High resilienceLow resilienceXLow resistance High resistanceLow local stabilityHigh local stabilityLow global stabilityHigh global stabilityDynamically robustDynamically fragileStable
combinations
Figure 20.7 Various aspects of stability,
used in this chapter to describe
communities, illustrated here in a
figurative way. In the resilience diagrams,
Environmental parameter 1X marks the spot from which the
Environmental parameter 2
community has been displaced.
number of zeros. The webs could then be described by three
Each species was influenced by its interaction with all other species,
and the term β
ij was used to measure the effect of species j’s
parameters: S, the number of species; C, the ‘connectance’ of the
web (the fraction of all possible pairs of species that interacted
density on species i’s rate of increase. The food webs were ‘randomly
directly, i.e. with β
ijnon-zero); and β , the average ‘interaction
assembled’, with all self-regulatory terms ( β
ii, β
jj, etc.) set at − 1,
strength’ (i.e. the average of the non-zero β values, disregarding
but all other β values distributed at random, including a certain
sign). May found that these food webs were only likely to be
the conflicting results amongst the models at least suggest that
stable (i.e. the populations would return to equilibrium after a
no single relationship will be appropriate in all communities. It
small disturbance) if:
would be wrong to replace one sweeping generalization with
another.
β (SC)
1/2< 1. (20.1)
Bạn đang xem 20. - FROM INDIVIDUALS TO ECOSYSTEMS 4TH EDITION CHAPTER 20 DOC