(15,36) → ¬Z;AND THUS, WE GET A CONTRADICTION AT 15
15: (8,15)→ ¬x; 15: (15,14)→ ¬y; 15: (15,36) → ¬z;and thus, we get a contradiction at 15. aFinally, let us also consider the subgraph ˙G
×
+
ofG×
+
defined as follows: The vertex-setof ˙G×
+
is again the set of positive integers, and n joined tom if for some distinct x, y ∈Nwe have n =x+y and m =x·y.Like for G×
+
, we can show that the chromatic number of ˙G×
+
is at least 4, but thesubgraph which provides the counterexample is much larger.≥4.Proposition4.2. χ G˙×
+
Proof. Let ˙G29
be the subgraph of ˙G×
+
induced by the 29 vertices 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15,