. SIMILAR TO THE NM, THEY USE THE DISCOURSE CORRECTNESS INTERPRET...
1998). Similar to the NM, they use the discourse
correctness interpretation. We find that if the NM
structure information to display a segmented inter-
was present users had fewer AsrMis and fewer
action history (SIH): an indented view of the inter-
SemMis (trend for SemMis, p<0.09).
In addition, a χ
2
dependency analysis showed
action augmented with purpose information. This
that the NM presence interacts significantly with
paper extends over their work in several areas. The
most salient difference is that here we investigate
both AsrMis (p<0.02) and SemMis (p<0.001), with
the benefits of displaying the discourse structure
fewer than expected AsrMis and SemMis in the
information for the users. In contrast, (Rich and
Sidner, 1998) never test the utility of the SIH.
3
Due to random assignment to conditions, before the
Their system uses a GUI-based interaction (no
first problem the F and S populations are similar (e.g. no
speech/text input, no speech output) while we look
difference in pretest); thus any differences in metrics
at a speech-based system. Also, their underlying
can be attributed to the NM presence/absence. However,
in the second problem, the two populations are not simi-
task (air travel domain) is much simpler than our
lar anymore as they have received different forms of
tutoring task. In addition, the SIH is not always
instruction; thus any difference has to be attributed to
available and users have to activate it manually.
the NM presence/absence in this problem as well as to
Other visual improvements for dialogue-based
the NM absence/presence in the previous problem.
computer tutors have been explored in the past
4