16. were you 17. will you 18. isn’t there 19. have you 20. won’t he
b. The results of the test:
The result of the 15-minute test:
Class Students 0 - 3 3.5 – 4.5 5 - 6 6.5 - 7.5 8 -10
tested
11A3 39 0 2 (5.13%) 15 13 9
(38.46%) (33.33%) (23.08%)
11A4 40 2 (5%) 8 (20%) 16 (40%) 10 (25%) 4 (10%)
The result of the two classes at the end of the first term:
Class Excellent Good level Average level Weak level Poor level
level (8-10) (6.5 – 7.9) (5 – 6.4) (3.5 – 4.9) (0 – 3.4)
11A3 (39) 3(7.69%) 13 (33.33%) 17 (43.59%) 6 (15.38%) 0
11A4 (40) 2 (5%) 12 (30%) 18 (45%) 8 (20%) 0
From the results mentioned above, we can see that the two classes with the
nearly similar quality of students (the result of the two classes at the end of the
first term), class 11A3 with the new teaching method has more students to perform
better. Only 5.13% students are under average in compare with 25% from class
11A4, and 56.41% students are at good or excellent levels whereas those of class
11A4 are 35%. It can also be seen that the students performed better than their
result at the end of the first term in terms of both the number of students at good or
excellent levels and the number of students at weak level.
The study has helped improve the quality of teaching and learning English in
Cam Thuy 3 High School. It helps encourage the students, especially the students at
average or under average students, to learn and practice.
Bạn đang xem 16. - TEACHING TAG QUESTION FOR CLASS 11A3 CAM THUY 3 HIGH SCHOOL