EXERCISE 3 (TEXTBOOK, PAGE 177)

16. were you 17. will you 18. isn’t there 19. have you 20. won’t he

b. The results of the test:

The result of the 15-minute test:

Class Students 0 - 3 3.5 – 4.5 5 - 6 6.5 - 7.5 8 -10

tested

11A3 39 0 2 (5.13%) 15 13 9

(38.46%) (33.33%) (23.08%)

11A4 40 2 (5%) 8 (20%) 16 (40%) 10 (25%) 4 (10%)

The result of the two classes at the end of the first term:

Class Excellent Good level Average level Weak level Poor level

level (8-10) (6.5 – 7.9) (5 – 6.4) (3.5 – 4.9) (0 – 3.4)

11A3 (39) 3(7.69%) 13 (33.33%) 17 (43.59%) 6 (15.38%) 0

11A4 (40) 2 (5%) 12 (30%) 18 (45%) 8 (20%) 0

From the results mentioned above, we can see that the two classes with the

nearly similar quality of students (the result of the two classes at the end of the

first term), class 11A3 with the new teaching method has more students to perform

better. Only 5.13% students are under average in compare with 25% from class

11A4, and 56.41% students are at good or excellent levels whereas those of class

11A4 are 35%. It can also be seen that the students performed better than their

result at the end of the first term in terms of both the number of students at good or

excellent levels and the number of students at weak level.

The study has helped improve the quality of teaching and learning English in

Cam Thuy 3 High School. It helps encourage the students, especially the students at

average or under average students, to learn and practice.