245, 275–296.
tion. Chem Today
27, 47–50.36 Munoz V & Serrano L (1994) Elucidating the folding
21 Mason JM, Hagemann UB & Arndt KM (2007)
Improved stability of the Jun–Fos activator protein-1
problem of helical peptides using empirical parameters.
coiled coil motif: a stopped-flow circular dichroism
Nat Struct Biol
1, 399–409.37 Copeland RA, Pompliano DL & Meek TD (2006)
kinetic analysis. J Biol Chem
282, 23015–23024.Drug-target residence time and its implications for lead
22 Mason JM & Arndt KM (2004) Coiled coil domains:
stability, specificity, and biological implications. Chem-
optimization. Nat Rev Drug Discov
5, 730–739.biochem
5, 170–176.38 Tummino PJ & Copeland RA (2008) Residence time of
receptor–ligand complexes and its effect on biological
23 Woolfson DN (2005) The design of coiled-coil struc-
tures and assemblies. Adv Protein Chem
70, 79–112.function. Biochemistry
47, 5481–5492.24 O’shea EK, Rutkowski R & Kim PS (1992) Mechanism
39 Wiseman T, Williston S, Brandts JF & Lin LN (1989)
Rapid measurement of binding constants and heats of
of specificity in the Fos–Jun oncoprotein heterodimer.
binding using a new titration calorimeter. Anal Biochem
Cell
68, 699–708.
Bạn đang xem 245, - BÁO CÁO KHOA HỌC: THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF JUN–FOS COILED COIL PEPTIDE ANTAGONISTS PDF
